Gtx 590 Vs Gtx 1050 Ti

1050 Ti vs 590

Toll now 313$

Games supported 84%

Price now 600$

Games supported 70%

General info

Comparison of graphics bill of fare architecture, market segment, value for coin and other general parameters.

Place in operation rating	233	372
Place by popularity	1	no data
Value for money	13.22	1.05
Compages	Pascal (2016−2021)	Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code name	N17P-G1	GF110
Marketplace segment	Desktop	Desktop
Release appointment	25 October 2016 (v years agone)	24 March 2011 (11 years agone)
Launch price (MSRP)	$139	$699
Current price	$313 (two.3x MSRP)	$600 (0.9x MSRP)

Value for coin

To become the alphabetize we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

Full general operation parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and heave clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you take to consider their benchmark and gaming exam results. Note that ability consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
CUDA cores	768	1024
Core clock speed	1290 MHz	607 MHz
Boost clock speed	1392 MHz	no data
Number of transistors	3,300 million	3,000 million
Manufacturing procedure technology	16 nm	xl nm
Thermal blueprint power (TDP)	75 Watt	365 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature	97 °C	97 °C
Texture make full rate	66.82	77.7 billion/sec
Floating-point performance	2,138 gflops	2x one,244.2 gflops

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Information on compatibility with other reckoner components. Useful when choosing a futurity computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it'south interface and motorcoach (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus support	no data	16x PCI-Eastward ii.0
Interface	PCIe 3.0 x16	PCIe ii.0 x16
Length	145 mm	11" (280 mm) (27.9 cm)
Height	no data	four.376" (111 mm) (11.1 cm)
Width	2-slot	2-slot
Supplementary ability connectors	None	Ii 8-pin
SLI options	no data	+

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, double-decker, clock and resulting bandwidth. Note that GPUs integrated into processors have no dedicated VRAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount	4 GB	3072 MB (1536 MB per GPU)
Memory motorbus width	128 Bit	768-bit (384-bit per GPU)
Memory clock speed	seven GB/southward	1707 MHz
Memory bandwidth	112 GB/due south	327.seven GB/s
Shared memory	-	-

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors nowadays on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise just for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may alter the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the carte itself.

Display Connectors	1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort	Iii Dual Link DVI-IMini DisplayPort
Multi monitor back up	no information	+
HDMI	+	+
Maximum VGA resolution	no information	2048x1536
Thousand-SYNC support	+	no data
Audio input for HDMI	no data	Internal

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you lot need some particular engineering science for your purposes.

VR Fix	+	no data
Ansel	+	no information

API support

APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.

DirectX	12 (12_1)	12 (11_0)
Shader Model	6.4	5.1
OpenGL	four.six	4.2
OpenCL	1.two	ane.1
Vulkan	one.2.131	N/A
CUDA	+	+

Benchmark performance

Not-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Notation that overall benchmark operation is measured in points in 0-100 range.

Overall score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you detect some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak upward in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Passmark
3DMark 11 Performance GPU
3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
GeekBench 5 OpenCL

This is probably the most ubiquitous criterion, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. Information technology gives the graphics menu a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four carve up benchmarks for Direct3D versions ix, 10, 11 and 12 (the final being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Benchmark coverage: 26%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark by Futuremark. It used four tests based on two scenes, one existence few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken ship, the other is an abandoned temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Fourth dimension Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Fire Strike is a DirectX xi benchmark for gaming PCs. It features two divide tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly made of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: xiv%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from eleven different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API past Khronos Group.

Criterion coverage: 9%

Mining hashrates

Cryptocurrency mining performance of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti and GeForce GTX 590. Usually measured in megahashes per second.

Bitcoin / BTC (SHA256)	326 Mh/s	107 Mh/s
Decred / DCR (Decred)	1.01 Gh/s	no information
Ethereum / ETH (DaggerHashimoto)	12.62 Mh/south	no data
Monero / XMR (CryptoNight)	0.3 kh/south	no data
Zcash / ZEC (Equihash)	156.48 Sol/s	no data

Gaming operation

Let's run into how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Detail gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Boilerplate FPS

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of pop games across different resolutions:

900p	no data	47
Full HD	50 −118%	109 +118%
1200p	no information	112
1440p	31	no data
4K	25	no data

Popular games

Full HD
Low Preset
Full HD
Medium Preset
Total HD
Loftier Preset
Full Hd
Ultra Preset
1440p
High Preset
1440p
Ultra Preset
4K
High Preset
4K
Ultra Preset

Cyberpunk 2077

21−24

10−12

Assassinator'south Creed Odyssey	48 +336%	x−12 −336%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −xc.9%
Battleground v	63 +473%	10−12 −473%
Telephone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	21−24 +90.9%	x−12 −90.ix%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +xc.nine%	10−12 −90.ix%
Far Cry 5	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Far Cry New Dawn	48 +336%	10−12 −336%
Forza Horizon 4	69 +527%	10−12 −527%
Hitman iii	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.ix%
Horizon Nada Dawn	21−24 +90.ix%	ten−12 −90.9%
Red Dead Redemption 2	35 +218%	10−12 −218%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	31 +182%	10−12 −182%
Lookout Dogs: Legion	21−24 +90.nine%	10−12 −90.9%

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	twoscore +264%	x−12 −264%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.nine%
Battlefield 5	52 +373%	10−12 −373%
Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare	39 +255%	ten−12 −255%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Far Weep 5	21−24 +90.nine%	10−12 −ninety.ix%
Far Weep New Dawn	45 +309%	10−12 −309%
Forza Horizon 4	64 +482%	10−12 −482%
Hitman iii	21−24 +90.nine%	10−12 −90.ix%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +ninety.nine%	10−12 −90.9%
Metro Exodus	26 +136%	10−12 −136%
Scarlet Dead Redemption 2	xviii +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	27 +145%	10−12 −145%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	49 +345%	10−12 −345%
Spotter Dogs: Legion	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −ninety.9%

Assassinator's Creed Odyssey	24 +118%	10−12 −118%
Assassinator'due south Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.nine%	x−12 −90.9%
Battlefield 5	51 +364%	10−12 −364%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +90.9%	ten−12 −90.9%
Far Cry v	36 +227%	10−12 −227%
Far Cry New Dawn	41 +273%	10−12 −273%
Forza Horizon iv	45 +309%	10−12 −309%
The Witcher iii: Wild Hunt	26 +136%	x−12 −136%
Spotter Dogs: Legion	21−24 +xc.9%	ten−12 −90.nine%

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare	24 +118%	10−12 −118%
Hitman three	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +90.9%	x−12 −90.9%
Metro Exodus	21−24 +90.nine%	ten−12 −ninety.9%
Ruby Dead Redemption 2	21−24 +ninety.ix%	10−12 −ninety.ix%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +90.ix%	ten−12 −90.9%

Assassin's Creed Odyssey	21−24 +90.nine%	10−12 −ninety.ix%
Assassin's Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −xc.nine%
Battlefield 5	36 +227%	10−12 −227%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +xc.ix%	10−12 −xc.ix%
Far Cry v	21−24 +90.9%	x−12 −ninety.ix%
Far Weep New Dawn	29 +164%	10−12 −164%
Forza Horizon iv	21−24 +xc.ix%	x−12 −ninety.9%
Sentry Dogs: Legion	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%

Call of Duty: Modernistic Warfare	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Hitman iii	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −xc.9%
Horizon Zero Dawn	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.nine%
Metro Exodus	nine −22.2%	10−12 +22.2%
Ruby-red Expressionless Redemption 2	21−24 +90.9%	ten−12 −xc.9%
Shadow of the Tomb Raider	21−24 +90.nine%	ten−12 −90.nine%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt	21−24 +90.9%	x−12 −90.9%

Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey	21−24 +xc.9%	10−12 −xc.9%
Assassinator'southward Creed Valhalla	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −90.9%
Battlefield 5	18 +63.6%	10−12 −63.6%
Cyberpunk 2077	21−24 +90.9%	10−12 −ninety.9%
Far Weep 5	21−24 +90.ix%	10−12 −xc.nine%
Far Cry New Dawn	xiv +27.three%	10−12 −27.iii%
Forza Horizon 4	20 +81.viii%	10−12 −81.8%
Watch Dogs: Legion	21−24 +ninety.9%	x−12 −ninety.9%

Advantages and disadvantages

Performance rating	21.36	11.33
Novelty	25 Oct 2016	24 March 2011
Toll	$139	$699
Memory passenger vehicle width	128	768
Pipelines / CUDA cores	768	1024
Memory bandwidth	112	327.7
Fleck lithography	16 nm	twoscore nm
Thermal design ability (TDP)	75 Watt	365 Watt

Judging by the results of synthetic and gaming tests, Technical City recommends

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti

since it shows ameliorate operation.

Should yous still have questions concerning choice betwixt the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Practise you recollect nosotros are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics bill of fare.

Competitors of GeForce GTX 1050 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti from AMD is Radeon R9 380, which is slower by ane% and lower by 2 positions in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 1050 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti 100

Competitors of GeForce GTX 590 by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce GTX 590 from AMD is Radeon RX 560X, which is slower past v% and lower past 9 positions in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce GTX 590:

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Hither yous tin can run across the user rating of the graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Ti on a calibration of ane to v:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce GTX 590 on a scale of 1 to 5:

Questions and comments

Here y'all can ask a question nigh this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.

Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS